JPP Law Blog
Disabled employee wins claim over ‘forced evening work’
A disabled employee has won a constructive dismissal claim after his employer 'forced' him to work evenings.
The employee joined the firm in October 2011. He regularly worked 12 to 14-hour days that stretched well into the evening.
In July 2012 he was involved in an accident that resulted in him developing issues such as dizziness, fatigue, headaches and difficulty concentrating.
He worked reduced hours when he returned from recuperating, but after six months his working day start increasing again until 6.30 to 7pm.
When he initially agreed to work late, his employer expected that he would continue to do so indefinitely.
However, after four months he objected to working into the evening. This led to a heated exchange between the employee and one of the owners of the business.
The owner berated him in front of his colleagues and demanded an apology. He also said that if he didn't like it he could leave.
The employee resigned due to the owner's conduct and because he was being 'forced' to work evenings.
He brought proceedings for disability discrimination and constructive dismissal. He told the Employment Tribunal that he would have retracted his resignation if he had been asked to do so.
The company claimed the employee would have resigned from his job even anyway as his wife had accepted a job in the US.
The tribunal ruled that this was why he had resigned rather than the argument with the owner over evening hours. It also said that the employee had not been 'required' to work evening hours; just that it was 'expected' of him.
However, the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) overturned those decisions. It said that the tribunal had displayed a narrow view of the circumstances.
It held that the employee resigned in response to a fundamental breach of his employment contract.
The Court of Appeal upheld the EAT ruling.
For further advice on any of the issues raised in this article, or for employment law advice more generally, please contact JPP Law on 020 3468 3064 or email info@jpplaw.co.uk
JPP Law Blog

- Case Studies and Reviews (9)
- Commercial Law (108)
- Dispute Resolution (27)
- Employment Law (119)
- Intellectual Property (3)
- Start-ups (25)
- Videos (8)
- 2022 May (1)
- 2022 April (3)
- 2022 March (2)
- 2022 February (2)
- 2022 January (2)
- 2021 December (1)
- 2021 November (1)
- 2021 October (1)
- 2021 September (1)
- 2021 August (1)
- 2021 July (1)
- 2021 May (1)
- 2021 April (1)
- 2021 March (1)
- 2021 February (1)
- 2021 January (1)
- 2020 December (1)
- 2020 November (2)
- 2020 October (2)
- 2020 September (2)
- 2020 August (1)
- 2020 July (3)
- 2020 June (1)
- 2020 May (3)
- 2020 April (1)
- 2020 March (2)
- 2020 February (2)
- 2020 January (2)
- 2019 December (2)
- 2019 October (1)
- 2019 September (5)
- 2019 July (3)
- 2019 June (2)
- 2019 May (2)
- 2019 April (3)
- 2019 March (2)
- 2019 February (2)
- 2019 January (2)
- 2018 December (2)
- 2018 October (4)
- 2018 September (12)
- 2018 February (6)
- 2018 January (7)
- 2017 December (2)
- 2018 July (14)
- 2018 June (2)
- 2018 May (13)
- 2018 April (8)
- 2018 March (11)
- 2017 November (6)
- 2017 October (12)
- 2017 September (14)
- 2017 July (7)
- 2017 June (10)
- 2017 May (6)
- 2017 April (4)
- 2017 March (11)
- 2017 February (6)
- 2017 January (1)
- 2016 December (2)
- 2016 September (4)
- 2016 July (1)