JPP Law Blog
Court clarifies when NHS employees can claim injury benefits
A hospital consultant has won a claim for injury benefit against the NHS. In granting his appeal, the High Court set out the correct approach to be taken when assessing such claims.
David Stewart was a consultant paediatrician with NHS Business Services Authority.
He took professional paid leave, approved by his employer, to speak at a conference in India. After the conference, he took annual leave travelling elsewhere in India.
At some point, he contracted dengue fever from a mosquito bite. He suffered serious consequences, eventually leading to inability to work. He applied for temporary injury allowance.
The allowance was payable to an NHS worker by reference to National Health Service (Injury Benefits) Regulations in the case of "a disease which is contracted in the course of his employment and which is wholly or mainly attributable to his employment".
A doctor's report stated that there was no corroboration of when Mr Stewart had been bitten, but that there was no medical evidence to contradict his account of having been bitten at the conference.
The employer, an adjudicator and the ombudsman all found against Mr Stewart on the basis that he had failed to provide evidence that he had contracted the disease at the conference rather than on annual leave, and that in any event he had not attended the conference as part of his employment.
The High Court has overturned that ruling. In doing so it outlined the process by which such cases should be decided.
The first step was to identify the disease. The second was to identify the employee's contractual duties by reference to their contract of employment. The third was to ask whether the disease was contracted in the course of employment. If the answer to the third step was yes, the fourth step was to ask whether the employment was the whole or main cause of the disease being contracted.
If the answer to the third or fourth step was no, the fifth step was to ask whether the 'duties of employment' were the whole or main cause of the disease being contracted.
The court considered each point in turn and found in favour of Mr Steward each time. It held that, on the evidence, he had clearly established on the balance of probabilities that the infected bite had happened at the conference while he was there for employment purposes and so he was entitled to claim injury benefit.
For further advice on any of the issues raised in this article, or for employment law advice more generally, please contact JPP Law on 020 3468 3064 or email info@jpplaw.co.uk
JPP Law Blog

- Case Studies and Reviews (9)
- Commercial Law (108)
- Dispute Resolution (27)
- Employment Law (119)
- Intellectual Property (3)
- Start-ups (25)
- Videos (8)
- 2022 May (1)
- 2022 April (3)
- 2022 March (2)
- 2022 February (2)
- 2022 January (2)
- 2021 December (1)
- 2021 November (1)
- 2021 October (1)
- 2021 September (1)
- 2021 August (1)
- 2021 July (1)
- 2021 May (1)
- 2021 April (1)
- 2021 March (1)
- 2021 February (1)
- 2021 January (1)
- 2020 December (1)
- 2020 November (2)
- 2020 October (2)
- 2020 September (2)
- 2020 August (1)
- 2020 July (3)
- 2020 June (1)
- 2020 May (3)
- 2020 April (1)
- 2020 March (2)
- 2020 February (2)
- 2020 January (2)
- 2019 December (2)
- 2019 October (1)
- 2019 September (5)
- 2019 July (3)
- 2019 June (2)
- 2019 May (2)
- 2019 April (3)
- 2019 March (2)
- 2019 February (2)
- 2019 January (2)
- 2018 December (2)
- 2018 October (4)
- 2018 September (12)
- 2018 February (6)
- 2018 January (7)
- 2017 December (2)
- 2018 July (14)
- 2018 June (2)
- 2018 May (13)
- 2018 April (8)
- 2018 March (11)
- 2017 November (6)
- 2017 October (12)
- 2017 September (14)
- 2017 July (7)
- 2017 June (10)
- 2017 May (6)
- 2017 April (4)
- 2017 March (11)
- 2017 February (6)
- 2017 January (1)
- 2016 December (2)
- 2016 September (4)
- 2016 July (1)